| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
1. [FREE WARDEC] Pandemic Legion now accepting any and all allies - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote: Gee, if only someone had said that maybe this whole unlimited free allies for the defender was going to end up EXACTLY LIKE THIS. What is the problem with it? Maybe unlimited free allies will make some high sec ga...
- by Five Thirty - at 2012.05.23 15:03:00
|
2. ban request - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
There is a whole thread dedicated to reporting people who violate the rules on SiSi.... I'm sure if you look really hard, you'll find it.
- by Five Thirty - at 2012.05.23 14:59:00
|
3. lvl 4 undecided ship - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Navy raven is always a good choice.
- by Five Thirty - at 2012.05.22 15:46:00
|
4. Let carebears be carebears (PVP Opt Out) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Non-consensual ship to ship combat. Is that simple enough for you gankbears?
- by Five Thirty - at 2012.05.18 00:18:00
|
5. Let carebears be carebears (PVP Opt Out) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
I'm pretty sure everyone is familiar with what is PvP and what is not... The OP was specifically talking about non-consensual PvP via suicide gank, being tricked into agression, and high sec war. So much for the gankbears trying to claim they a...
- by Five Thirty - at 2012.05.17 21:03:00
|
6. Guestimate How Much Suicide Gank You Would Need? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Rel'k Bloodlor wrote: You some how trick him in to going aggro on you in hi-sec? No need to get agression for suicide ganks. Just lock and rock.
- by Five Thirty - at 2012.05.17 16:41:00
|
7. War targets ........in contacts - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Tobiaz wrote: It's funny how players keep accusing CCP from 'dumbing down' the game, yet some players are even worse by offering free 3rd party tools like EVE-who, so even the most incompetent corporations can still get decent intel on their en...
- by Five Thirty - at 2012.05.17 16:40:00
|
8. Concorded during War - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
I agree. Either it's a valid target, or you should get a concord warning.
- by Five Thirty - at 2012.05.15 18:16:00
|
9. Grand Theft Aeronautics - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
It won't work. You can't gain agression from drones by stealing a can. Even set to agressive, they will only attack a target which is attacking their controller.
- by Five Thirty - at 2012.05.15 15:15:00
|
10. Concorded during War - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
You can't suppress the concord warning, at least according to CCP. However, it seems to be that agressing a target within a few minutes after a war is scheduled to start might be a bit foolhardy. I'm well aware that it's an excellent tactic to c...
- by Five Thirty - at 2012.05.15 15:10:00
|
11. Which boat for lvl4 missions - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Cheapest generally means least popular. It doesn't mean bad. It is my opinion that it is cheapest partly due to the fact that nobody used rattlesnakes for incursions. Because incursions generated additional demand for Machs and Vindis, their price...
- by Five Thirty - at 2012.05.14 22:11:00
|
12. Acc - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
There is an ENTIRE thead dedicated to this request.
- by Five Thirty - at 2012.05.14 19:07:00
|
13. Which boat for lvl4 missions - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
It's not all about speed, which is why I love my rattlesnake. With excellent skills, it's a great mission boat. After the summer patch and the introduction of drone damage mods, it will be even nicer.
- by Five Thirty - at 2012.05.14 18:21:00
|
14. Destroyer vs 325mil is balanced. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Abannan wrote: Five Thirty wrote: Abannan wrote: A hulk has 3 turret hardpoints and a destroyer has 8. With 8 mining lasers, the destroyer yields less then the hulk clearly unbalanced A hulk has 0, actually. You know what I mean't ...
- by Five Thirty - at 2012.05.14 04:00:00
|
15. Let carebears be carebears (PVP Opt Out) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Sugar Kyle wrote: Non consensual PVP is not griefing. Just because you do not like or want it does not mean it is grief. This is a game where everyone can interact with you in positive and negitive ways. It is a game where your choice matters. ...
- by Five Thirty - at 2012.05.14 03:54:00
|
16. Let carebears be carebears (PVP Opt Out) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Jayrendo Karr wrote: How about we just save CCP time and trouble and take an axe to the servers, either way the result is the same. Contrary to popular belief, EvE will not collapse if we get rid of griefing.
- by Five Thirty - at 2012.05.13 23:51:00
|
17. Destroyer vs 325mil is balanced. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Abannan wrote: A hulk has 3 turret hardpoints and a destroyer has 8. With 8 mining lasers, the destroyer yields less then the hulk clearly unbalanced A hulk has 0, actually.
- by Five Thirty - at 2012.05.13 23:49:00
|
18. Let carebears be carebears (PVP Opt Out) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Commissar Veldt wrote: It can be annoying losing ships or being war dec'd yes, but its part of the game full stop. EVE is marketed on its ability to give ALL players the freedom do what they want within its universe. This statement isn't exa...
- by Five Thirty - at 2012.05.13 18:51:00
|
19. Let carebears be carebears (PVP Opt Out) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Derath Ellecon wrote: The problem is that what you are trying to advocate goes against the wonderful sandbox that is eve. As I said on page two (which probably got missed). The thing about the sandbox is that every choice you have has consequen...
- by Five Thirty - at 2012.05.13 18:48:00
|
20. Let carebears be carebears (PVP Opt Out) - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Rond Dorlezahn wrote: You haven't thought this through at all. If you were to implement this opt-out mechanic, it would get abused harder than CONCORD response time in hisec is currently being abused. It would not be 1000 players who used it, i...
- by Five Thirty - at 2012.05.13 18:42:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |